We’ve been following the Pfizer vaccine story since early March when German biotech firm BioNTech introduced two strategic partnerships to advance vaccine improvement with Pfizer and Fosun Pharma of China. On November 9, Pfizer and BioNTech introduced that their COVID-19 vaccine would defend 43,500 individuals in 6 nations 90% with no security issues. Pfizer later requested the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) for the emergency use of its COVID-19 vaccine within the U.S. ten days later.
The FDA mentioned two individuals died from the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine research due to issues about vaccine security. The revelation of the deaths was buried on web page 50 of the 90-page data doc. Nonetheless, two days later, the FDA authorized Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for approval for emergency use. The company additionally requested Pfizer to “present experiences resulting in hospitalization or demise”.
Now, for the primary time, the New York Occasions experiences that an Alaska well being care employee who had no historical past of allergic reactions was hospitalized on Tuesday with a “extreme allergic response” after taking Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine had acquired. The reported allergic response is much like two different reactions reported within the UK.
Based on the NY Occasions, the response from well being employees in Alaska was reportedly much like the anaphylactic reactions two therapeutic employees within the UK skilled after receiving the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine final week. The 2 Britons, who had extreme allergic reactions up to now, later recovered, the NY Occasions mentioned.
A 49-year-old lady is allergic to eggs (which Pfizer says is just not in her vaccine). The opposite, a 40-year-old lady, is allergic to varied medicine. Each routinely put on EpiPenn-like gadgets when responding. Here is what the NY Occasions said:
“After employees within the UK received sick, authorities there warned towards giving the vaccines to anybody with a historical past of extreme allergic reactions. They later clarified their issues and adjusted the wording of “extreme allergic reactions” to imply that the vaccine shouldn’t be given to anybody who has ever had an anaphylactic response to a meals, medication or vaccine. That sort of response to a vaccine is “very uncommon,” they mentioned.
In the meantime, Alex Berenson is a retired NYT reporter and writer of Inform Your Youngsters and Unreported Truths about COVID-19 and lockdowns. After studying hundreds of pages of FDA and CDC paperwork on the vaccine, Alex mentioned, “I am unable to put this extra clearly: After a 12 months of trust-shattering public well being forms rulings mendacity concerning the facet impact profile of The @pfizer vaccine causes harm that can not be repaired. The information are clear: Many individuals may have very disagreeable uncomfortable side effects … “
Berenson is just not alone. Beneath are the statements made by Dr. James Todaro (MD Medical Diploma, Columbia College):
“If you’re contemplating the Pfizer vaccine, you already know you might be receiving an EXPERIMENTAL vaccine. You might be collaborating in a research to search for adversarial occasions. Suppose twice if you’re beneath 50 and have an IFR under 0.02%. Picture under from the FDA’s EEA for the Pfizer vaccine. “
If you’re contemplating the Pfizer vaccine, it must be recognized that you’re receiving an EXPERIMENTAL vaccine.
You might be collaborating in a research to search for adversarial occasions
Suppose twice if you’re beneath 50 and have an IFR under 0.02%.
Picture under from the FDA’s EEA for the Pfizer vaccine. pic.twitter.com/MggbV8PBe5
– James Todaro, MD (@JamesTodaroMD) December 14, 2020
In the meantime, Pfizer’s CEO is not sure whether or not the vaccine will forestall coronavirus transmission. Additionally it is unclear whether or not vaccinated individuals can nonetheless transmit COVID-19 to others.